{"id":9150,"date":"2015-05-01T15:06:04","date_gmt":"2015-05-01T14:06:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/?p=9150"},"modified":"2021-01-13T10:42:16","modified_gmt":"2021-01-13T10:42:16","slug":"the-guardian-view-britain-needs-a-new-direction-britain-needs-labour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/05\/01\/the-guardian-view-britain-needs-a-new-direction-britain-needs-labour\/","title":{"rendered":"The Guardian view: Britain needs a new direction, Britain needs Labour"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fingers crossed that we can move forward.\u00a0<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

\n

\"PoweredThis article titled “The Guardian view: Britain needs a new direction, Britain needs Labour” was written by Editorial, for The Guardian on Friday 1st May 2015 12.15 UTC<\/a><\/p>\n

The campaign is nearly over and it is time to choose. We believe Britain needs a new direction. At home, the economic recovery is only fragile, while social cohesion is threatened by the unequal impact of the financial crisis and the continuing attempt to shrink the postwar state. Abroad, Britain remains traumatised by its wars, and, like our neighbours, is spooked by Vladimir Putin, the rise of jihadist terrorism and by mounting migratory pressures. In parts of Britain, nationalist and religious identities are threatening older solidarities, while privacy and freedom sometimes feel under siege, even as we mark 800 years since Magna Carta. More people in Britain are leading longer, healthier and more satisfying lives than ever before \u2013 yet too many of those lives feel stressed in ways to which politics struggles to respond, much less to shape.<\/p>\n

This is the context in which we must judge the record of the outgoing coalition and the choices on offer to voters on 7 May. Five years ago, Labour was exhausted and conflicted, amid disenchantment over war, recession and Gordon Brown\u2019s leadership. The country was ready for a change, one we hoped would see a greatly strengthened Liberal Democrat presence in parliament combine with the core Labour tradition to reform politics after the expenses scandal. That did not happen. Instead the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have governed together for five difficult years.<\/p>\n

That experiment has clearly run its course. The outgoing government proved that coalitions can function<\/a>, which is important, and it can be proud of its achievements on equal marriage and foreign aid. But its record, as our recent series of editorials on detailed themes has shown<\/a>, is dominated by an initial decision to pursue a needless and disastrous fiscal rigidity<\/a>. That turned into a moral failure, by insisting on making the neediest and the least secure pay the highest price<\/a> for an economic and financial crash that they did not cause. The evidence is there in the one million annual visits to foodbanks, a shocking figure in what is, still, a wealthy country.<\/p>\n

David Cameron has been an increasingly weak prime minister. On issues such as Europe<\/a>, the integrity of the United Kingdom, climate change, human rights<\/a> and the spread of the low-wage economy, he has been content to lead the Tories back towards their nastiest and most Thatcherite comfort zones. All this is particularly disappointing after the promise of change that Mr Cameron once embodied.<\/p>\n

The union at risk<\/h2>\n

The Conservative campaign has redoubled all this. Economically, the party offers more of the same, prioritising public-sector austerity which will worsen life for the most needy \u2013 imposing \u00a312bn of largely unspecified welfare cuts \u2013 while doing little to ensure the rich and comfortable pay a fair share. Internationally, the party is set on a referendum over Europe which many of its activists hope will end in UK withdrawal. It\u2019s also set on an isolationist abandonment of British commitment to international human rights conventions and norms, outcomes which this newspaper \u2013 unlike most others \u2013 will always do all in its power to oppose. At the same time, the Tories go out of their way to alienate Scotland and put the UK at risk<\/a>. The two are related: if a 2017 referendum did result in a British exit from the EU, it could trigger a fresh and powerful demand for a Scottish exit from the UK. The Conservative campaign has been one of the tawdriest in decades.<\/p>\n

The overriding priority on 7 May is therefore, first, to stop the Conservatives from returning to government and, second, to put a viable alternative in their place. For many decades, this newspaper\u2019s guiding star has been the formulation offered by John Maynard Keynes in a speech in Manchester in 1926: \u201cThe political problem of mankind is to combine three things: economic efficiency, social justice and individual liberty.\u201d The task on 7 May is to elect the parliament and government that will come closest to passing Keynes\u2019s triple test.<\/p>\n

Some despair of the whole system, believing a model created for two-party politics is now exhausted, failing to give adequate expression to the diverse society we have become. We are hardly newcomers to that view: we have demanded electoral reform for a century and believe that demand will find new vigour on 8 May. But for now, this is the voting system we\u2019ve got. How should we use it?<\/p>\n

To the charge that they enabled a government whose record we reject, the Liberal Democrats would plead that they made a difference, mitigating and blocking on issues such as Europe, the environment, child benefit and human rights, without which things would have been worse. That adds weight to the view that the next Commons would be enhanced by the presence of Lib Dem MPs to insist on the political reform and civil liberties agendas \u2013 as they did, almost alone, over Edward Snowden\u2019s revelations. Similarly, it would be good to hear Green voices in Westminster to press further on climate change and sustainability. Where the real constituency choice is between these parties and the Conservatives, as it is between the Lib Dems and the Tories in the south-west, we support a vote for them. But they are not the answer.<\/p>\n

In Scotland, politics is going through a cultural revolution. The energy and engagement on show are formidable \u2013 and welcome. The level of registration is an example to the rest of Britain. If the polls are right, and the SNP is returned as Scotland\u2019s majority party, we must respect that choice \u2013 and would expect all parties that believe in the union, and the equal legitimacy of all its citizens, to do the same. We do that even as we maintain our view that, whatever myriad problems the peoples of these islands face, the solution is not nationalism. Breaking apart is not the answer: not in Europe and not in the UK. We still believe that the union rests on something precious \u2013 the social and economic solidarity of four distinct nations \u2013 and that is to be nurtured and strengthened, not turned against itself.<\/p>\n

A sense of what is just<\/h2>\n

Which brings us to Labour. There have been times when a Labour vote has been, at best, a pragmatic choice \u2013 something to be undertaken without enthusiasm. This is not such a time. Of course there are misgivings. The party has some bad instincts \u2013 on civil liberties, penal policy and on Trident, about which it is too inflexible. Questions linger over Ed Miliband\u2019s leadership, and whether he has that elusive quality that inspires others to follow.<\/p>\n

But Mr Miliband has grown in this campaign. He may not have stardust or TV-ready charisma, but those are qualities that can be overvalued. He has resilience and, above all, a strong sense of what is just. Mr Miliband understood early one of the central questions of the age: inequality. While most Tories shrug at that yawning gap between rich and poor, Labour will at least strive to slow and even reverse the three-decade march towards an obscenely unequal society. It is Labour that speaks with more urgency than its rivals on social justice, standing up to predatory capitalism, on investment for growth, on reforming and strengthening the public realm, Britain\u2019s place in Europe and international development \u2013 and which has a record in government that it can be more proud of than it sometimes lets on.<\/p>\n

In each area, Labour could go further and be bolder. But the contrast between them and the Conservatives is sharp. While Labour would repeal the bedroom tax, the Tories are set on those \u00a312bn of cuts to social security, cuts that will have a concrete and painful impact on real lives. Even if they don\u2019t affect you, they will affect your disabled neighbour, reliant on a vital service that suddenly gets slashed, or the woman down the street, already working an exhausting double shift and still not able to feed her children without the help of benefits that are about to be squeezed yet further. For those people, and for many others, a Labour government can make a very big difference.<\/p>\n

This newspaper has never been a cheerleader for the Labour party. We are not now. But our view is clear. Labour provides the best hope for starting to tackle the turbulent issues facing us. On 7 May, as this country makes a profound decision about its future, we hope Britain turns to Labour.<\/p>\n

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010<\/p>\n

Published via the Guardian News Feed<\/a> plugin<\/a> for WordPress.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Election 2015 poses some profound questions for this country. Ed Miliband has better answers than his rivals, and so deserves a chance to govern<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,79,26,48,54,97,57,164,137,129,138,233,232,163,234,44,126,96,94,51,281,45,110,109,66,53,235,46,176,68],"class_list":["post-9150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-musings","tag-article","tag-austerity","tag-business","tag-comment","tag-conservatives","tag-david-cameron","tag-economics","tag-ed-miliband","tag-editorial","tag-editorials","tag-editorials-reply","tag-europe","tag-european-union","tag-general-election-2015","tag-human-rights","tag-labour","tag-law","tag-liberal-democrats","tag-liberal-conservative-coalition","tag-main-section","tag-opinion","tag-politics","tag-poverty","tag-social-exclusion","tag-society","tag-the-guardian","tag-uk-civil-liberties","tag-uk-news","tag-welfare","tag-world-news"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6NRDR-2nA","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":26628,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/12\/04\/the-guardian-view-on-labours-byelection-win-not-such-a-bad-week-after-all\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":0},"title":"The Guardian view on Labour\u2019s byelection win: not such a bad week after all","author":"diana Stone","date":"December 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Don\u2019t overstate what it all means \u2013 but Jeremy Corbyn was backed by most of his MPs over Syria and his party has now won an important byelection","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":134227,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2018\/12\/31\/there-is-a-path-to-a-second-referendum-and-only-labour-can-win-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":1},"title":"There is a path to a second referendum \u2013 and only Labour can win it","author":"diana Stone","date":"December 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"As the political class returns to Westminster, this could be the time that, through the Brexit process, Labour finds its path to power","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9419,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/05\/05\/meet-the-invisibles-the-wealthy-and-powerful-at-the-heart-of-the-tory-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":2},"title":"Meet the invisibles \u2013 the wealthy and powerful at the heart of the Tory party","author":"diana Stone","date":"May 5, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"In the City I came face to face with the reclusive influencers within Cameron\u2019s world. The experience showed me how profoundly divided our nation has become","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5924,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/02\/26\/the-guardian-view-on-zero-hours-the-number-that-keeps-getting-bigger\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":3},"title":"The Guardian view on zero-hours: the number that keeps getting bigger","author":"diana Stone","date":"February 26, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The quantity of jobs is a pleasant surprise in this recovery, but the quality is often a shock. Zero-hours workers must be given the right to demand fixed hours after six months","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5855,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/02\/23\/the-guardian-view-on-journalism-and-advertising-selling-the-news-short\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":4},"title":"The Guardian view on journalism and advertising: selling the news short","author":"diana Stone","date":"February 23, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The Telegraph faces searching questions about editorial independence from within its own ranks. The integrity of a British institution is on the line","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9916,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/05\/12\/an-obituary-from-the-year-2025-for-a-labour-party-that-abandoned-its-roots\/","url_meta":{"origin":9150,"position":5},"title":"An obituary from the year 2025 for a Labour party that abandoned its roots","author":"diana Stone","date":"May 12, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The party could withstand election defeats. But now it\u2019s clear that neglecting the people who needed it most was fatal","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9150\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}