{"id":37075,"date":"2016-03-28T22:15:05","date_gmt":"2016-03-28T21:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/?p=37075"},"modified":"2021-01-13T10:42:38","modified_gmt":"2021-01-13T10:42:38","slug":"two-tribes-go-to-war-and-neither-the-red-nor-the-blue-chief-is-safe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2016\/03\/28\/two-tribes-go-to-war-and-neither-the-red-nor-the-blue-chief-is-safe\/","title":{"rendered":"Two tribes go to war and neither the red nor the blue chief is safe"},"content":{"rendered":"

An interesting perspective.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

\n

\"PoweredThis article titled “Two tribes go to war and neither the red nor the blue chief is safe” was written by Andrew Rawnsley, for The Observer on Sunday 27th March 2016 05.04 UTC<\/a><\/p>\n

Napoleon wanted generals who were lucky. Napoleon would have liked David Cameron. He became Tory leader when Tony Blair\u2019s electoral magic had faded and his days were numbered. Lucky Dave then fought the 2010 election against a Labour party that had been in government for 13 years and was showing its age.<\/p>\n

His rival for the premiership had presided over the most severe economic crisis since the 1930s and, on his own account, Gordon Brown was not a politician suited for the television age<\/a>. When Mr Cameron failed to parlay those advantages into a parliamentary majority, he borrowed one from the Lib Dems<\/a>, who did sterling service sustaining him for five years while destroying their electoral base in the process.<\/p>\n

He gambled the United Kingdom with a referendum on Scottish independence<\/a>. Labour did the heavy lifting to keep the UK intact and its reward was to be toxified as Tory collaborators<\/a> in the eyes of many Scots. The devastation this wreaked on Labour support north of the border played to his advantage at the 2015 election by allowing the Tories to scare English voters with the thought that a Miliband government would be a marionette of the Nationalists<\/a>. Lady Luck also smiled on him when the pollsters, by calling the election wrong<\/a>, helped smooth his path back to No 10.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t put all this down to blind chance. That would be to underestimate Mr Cameron. He would not be approaching his sixth anniversary at No 10 were he not highly skilled at exploiting the opportunities that time, chance and opponents have presented to him. Like all successful leaders, he has made the most of his good fortune.<\/p>\n

The trouble with luck is that she eventually runs out. She seemed to be bidding farewell to this prime minister last weekend. He had been hit with the most dramatic and damaging resignation of his premiership when Iain Duncan Smith quit the cabinet <\/a>in a fit of vitriolic vapours. By Monday, the budget was unravelling <\/a>faster than you can say fiasco and George Osborne had gone into hiding. Mr Cameron had to face the Commons that afternoon. This should have been a horrible experience for him.<\/p>\n

Yet still he was in luck. Good fortune smiled on him in the bearded guise of his main inquisitor. His prayers for relief had been granted by St Jeremy, the patron saint of prime ministers in peril. Presented with a priceless opportunity to skewer the prime minister and take apart his claims to lead a one-nation government, Mr Corbyn decided the most effective approach was not to mention the self-defenestration of IDS and his excoriating attack on the cabinet which he had just left.<\/p>\n

The Labour leader did not<\/a>, as some have had it, kick the ball over the bar. He didn\u2019t even try to connect his foot with the ball. I am still trying to fathom why not. Had no one told him that a significant element of the job description of leader of the opposition is to, well, to oppose? Was he too preoccupied drawing up lists of suspected traitors <\/a>among Labour MPs to prepare for this important engagement at the dispatch box? Was he too busy tending to his allotment and nurturing his marrows<\/a> to have watched any news? Maybe I am over-thinking this. Maybe he is just hopeless.<\/p>\n

If that performance had Labour people looking on in stunned disbelief, there was worse to come <\/a>two days later at prime minister\u2019s questions. By then, Mr Corbyn had managed to find out that a member of the cabinet had resigned. But it was too late. Bringing it up 4 8 hours on only served to remind everyone that he had failed to stick the ball in the net two days earlier. On top of which, someone on his team carelessly lost a list which divided Labour MPs into five categories of loyalty and opposition to the great helmsman of Islington. The list fell ino enemy hands. So we all now know that his chief whip is designated \u201chostile\u201d and so is Labour\u2019s candidate to be mayor of London. \u201cCore group negative\u201d includes Ed Miliband and Alan Johnson, the leader of the Labour In campaign.<\/p>\n

The Tory leader used the exposure of the list to crush the man opposite. \u201cI thought I had problems,\u201d he jeered after saying they could put him down as \u201ccore support\u201d for Mr Corbyn remaining as Labour leader. A half hour that ought to have been torture for the prime minister turned into a humiliation for his opponent.<\/p>\n

The most devoted of Mr Corbyn\u2019s followers will say that this mockery shows that the Tories are frightened of the Labour leader. Let me try to break this as gently as I can. The Tories really, really are not scared of Mr Corbyn. Most Tories are more likely to lose sleep worrying about whether they put out the cat than they are about the Labour leader. For reasons I will describe in a moment, the Conservatives would be better served, and so would the country, if they were a bit more frightened of Labour. The other thing people will say is that parliamentary knockabout excites only people who live in the \u201cWestminster bubble\u201d. No one \u201cin the real world\u201d cares about this meaningless theatre.<\/p>\n

I agree that it is theatre, but it is far from meaningless. Parliament still matters for holding the prime minister to account. It matters more under this prime minister because he rarely deigns to grant substantial interviews with heavyweight media interrogators and only holds news conferences when he has absolutely no choice. The prospect of being tested by the leader of the opposition should, at the very least, make a prime minister nervous. It should keep him on his toes. Since he started facing Mr Corbyn, Mr Cameron clearly finds PMQs so effortless that the ease with which he cruises through them must embarrass even him. It also matters because how the party leaders perform in the Commons influences how the media rate and report on them and that plays its role in shaping public perceptions. It also has a significant impact on the morale of their parliamentary troops. At the end of that PMQs, you didn\u2019t need any lists to tell you what Labour MPs thought about Jeremy Corbyn. It was written on their funereal faces. An encounter which should have united them in exploiting the government\u2019s divisions and disarray turned into an occasion in which the Tories roared on their man as he ridiculed the Labour leader.<\/p>\n

My first column of this year<\/a> remarked that it is highly unusual for both major parties to be doing the splits at the same time. As this year grows older, things are getting even stranger. We now have a feedback loop in which the divisions in the Labour party feed those among the Tories and vice versa. Whatever their manifold and manifest differences, one thought unites nearly all Conservatives \u2013 that the next election is as good as won for them. This is encouraging Tories to think that they can behave however they like without fear of punishment at the ballot box.<\/p>\n

The empty space where an effective opposition ought to be is an incitement for the government to be complacent, cocky and slapdash. That arrogance has consequences, as we saw with the budget. At the same time, absent an opposition that they fear, Tory discipline is breaking down. The prime minister\u2019s internal opponents are emboldened to be more aggressive in their rebellions against the Tory leader. The language exchanged about Europe becomes more poisonous. It lessens the chances of putting the Conservative party back together again on the other side of the referendum.<\/p>\n

In normal times, we\u2019d expect this to have a positive effect on the opposition. The spectacle of Tories tearing into each other like a feral bunch of ferrets ought to be uniting Labour in a conviction that the next election is winnable for them. In these extraordinary times, Tory division has the opposite effect. It is not bringing Labour together; it is amplifying Labour\u2019s internal turbulence. Labour MPs see a Tory party which is bitterly split and despair that their own leadership seems utterly incapable of profiting from the opportunity that it ought to present to them.<\/p>\n

A few Labour MPs have broken cover and openly called <\/a>for Jeremy Corbyn to resign. Many more talk privately of an attempt to oust him once the EU referendum is over. Whether this will come to anything, we will see, but I would caution Mr Corbyn not to place too much reliance on that list as a guide to the mood in his parliamentary party. It has Labour MPs down as neutral or friendly who are, to my knowledge, hostiles.<\/p>\n

While talk of toppling their leader grows on the Labour side, regicide is also on the minds of a significant number of Tory MPs. Among them, there is much chatter that David Cameron will face a leadership challenge after the referendum, whether he wins it or not. It is possible that, before year\u2019s end, there will have been attempts from within both the major parties to oust their leaders. What would once have seemed wildly improbable is now quite easily conceivable. The terra becomes yet more incognita.<\/p>\n

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010<\/p>\n

Published via the Guardian News Feed<\/a> plugin<\/a> for WordPress.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is conceivable that before year\u2019s end there will be attempts within both major parties to oust their leaders<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[290,59,48,54,97,282,44,51,281,45,78],"class_list":["post-37075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-musings","tag-andrew-rawnsley","tag-article","tag-comment","tag-conservatives","tag-david-cameron","tag-jeremy-corbyn","tag-labour","tag-main-section","tag-opinion","tag-politics","tag-the-observer"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6NRDR-9DZ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2119,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2013\/12\/08\/mps-11-pay-rise-set-to-embarrass-party-leaders\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":0},"title":"MPs’ 11% pay rise set to embarrass party leaders","author":"diana Stone","date":"December 8, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Independent body will announce increase to \u00a374,000 from 2015 despite opposition from Cameron and Miliband","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7061,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/03\/26\/election-2015-i-couldnt-live-on-a-zero-hours-contract-cameron-tells-paxman-live\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":1},"title":"Cameron has edge over Miliband in TV battle, Guardian\/ICM poll shows – live","author":"diana Stone","date":"March 26, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"PM gets rough ride from Jeremy Paxman, who pressed him on the minimum wage, foreign policy and his 2010 pledges on VAT. Follow the audience Q&A nowNigel Farage gatecrashes the Sky studios \u2013 and heads to the barAll you need to know about tonight\u2019s Channel 4\/Sky News format","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":152735,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2019\/12\/02\/jewish-people-and-the-labour-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":2},"title":"Jewish people and the Labour party","author":"diana Stone","date":"December 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Michael Rosen writes: \"1. I've met people who think that there are no Jews left in the Labour Party. 2. I've met people who think that the Chief Rabbi is in some way or another in charge of, or a representative of all Jews in Britain. Neither of these statements\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":41860,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2016\/05\/18\/queens-speech-2016-uk-governments-legislative-programme-unveiled-live\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":3},"title":"Queen’s speech 2016: 21 bills including plan to ‘disrupt extremists’\u2013 live","author":"diana Stone","date":"May 18, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Rolling coverage of the Queen\u2019s speech, setting out the government\u2019s programme for the next session of parliament, and the opening of the Queen\u2019s speech debate, with speeches from David Cameron and Jeremy Corbyn","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21579,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/10\/08\/this-is-as-good-as-its-going-to-get-for-cameron-and-he-knows-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":4},"title":"This is as good as it’s going to get for Cameron \u2013 and he knows it","author":"diana Stone","date":"October 8, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The NHS safe because of us\u2019 was just one boast unwinding as he spoke. Secretly he must wish he could quit right now","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":9916,"url":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/2015\/05\/12\/an-obituary-from-the-year-2025-for-a-labour-party-that-abandoned-its-roots\/","url_meta":{"origin":37075,"position":5},"title":"An obituary from the year 2025 for a Labour party that abandoned its roots","author":"diana Stone","date":"May 12, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The party could withstand election defeats. But now it\u2019s clear that neglecting the people who needed it most was fatal","rel":"","context":"In "Musings"","block_context":{"text":"Musings","link":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/category\/musings\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Powered by Guardian.co.uk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-images\/Guardian\/Pix\/pictures\/2010\/03\/01\/poweredbyguardianBLACK.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37075\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glass-cage.com\/dianas_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}